
Several reader have sounds off on their opinion about this.
Here is some of the opinions.
Reader's e-mail:
It is fantastic that a
helicopter can reach the top now.
How much
extra weight can be hauled that high is the real mystery. Could supplies be
dropped off, such as oxygen bottles? Could people be carried that high, or
rescued from that high?
Tourist
helicopters to the top might cut down on the deaths of people that are
marginal climbers, and increase greatly the amount of people that get to enjoy
the view. It is terrible that some people will see that as a bad thing.
Are there
other times in the year when the wind is low for a few hours and a helicopter
could visit the top but it is not practical for climbers? This might expand
the days that the view can be enjoyed.
As I
understand it, Didier Delsalle did not exit the helicopter while at the
summit. He sat in the machine with only one part of the machine lightly
resting on the snow, but most of the weight still supported by the rotating
blades. The video shows the heli copter 'touching' the summit, but not really
settled on it firmly.
Reader's e-mail:
I have a problem with the video.
It does not look to me like they made a full, solid landing. Also, it seems
odd that there is nothing showing Didier Delsalle stepping out of the copter.
I would think that would be something they would have insisted on filming or
photographing.
Is it right
to land on Everest? Perhaps for rescue purposes, but, do the risks outweigh
the benefit? Well this open up the summit to those who will pay to land on it
just to say they stood on the top of the world? Bad idea.
I believe
the video is genuine but a "landing" I my book would involve no thrust to the
engines...This appears to be a touch and go to prove the helicopter's
capability to almost shut down at such an altitude given a landing area. The
test to 33,000 ft is the real feat here, and by no means is this to me a
qualified "assent" of Everest.
Reader's e-mail:
Whilst it may deplete the guide
incomes, a lot of the people currently attempting to climb the hill will opt
to fly there instead I think that it would take a lot of strain of the
mountain climbing routes. This in turn will make it easier for those who
really want to climb the mountain, as opposed to just stand on the top. It
will – if you like – separate the “sightseers” from the real adventurers.
Thanks for the site – it’s
been exciting to follow.
Reader's e-mail:
I do not think that flying to
the summit is a good thing. Although rescues from high altitude are now more
possible, that alone takes away from the risk and sense of accomplishment that
successful summiters must feel. If you minimize the risk (via rescue
choppers) you open up the mountain to even more inexperienced climbers who
really have no business being there. If sightseeing tours to the summit via
chopper are allowed then climbers will have to specify they CLIMBED to the
summit, they will no longer be identified as the elite simply by saying they
summitted.
Thank you
for allowing me to offer an opinion.
Reader's e-mail:
Your question regarding the
flight of a helicopter to the top of Everest, is interesting, Is it good? I am
certain that most climbers like myself will say no, because the thought of
touching this sacred space by any means other then your own power will be
considered obscene. The thought of someone being short roped up the mountain
is repulsive to most of us so image the individual who boasts he has been to
the top of Mt. Everest by means of a helicopter?
I am sure
some will say, "whatever rocks your boat" , all is fair. But for me flight to
the top of Everest opens doors which I dread in the future. It will surely not
be long before we have a rescue at the top of the mountain. Some poor soul
will just keep climbing late into the day not thinking about turn around times
because there will be notion that if they are exhausted when they reach the
top, they can just call for a rescue. And that will probably happen
successfully once. And the next time the weather will not allow for a landing
and someone will die, sitting on the top waiting for a ride. It is just this
scenario that should never be allowed to happen. The government will have the
ability to demand that no such flight should ever happen again, and they
should, if for no other reason but to protect some fool from himself. But will
this government have the courage to prohibit flight to the top for no reason
including rescue of a dying climber, I doubt it. And so Mt. Everest will
forever change once again and in my view there is nothing good in the so call
accomplishment. Thanks for letting us air our thoughts.
Is it good that we can now fly to the summit in a helicopter?
What do you think?
EverestNews.com has several questions into erucopter. This all has been
a bit strange, maybe they planned it that way... The press release is below.
For picture and video see
Download the video (wmv file - 17281 KB)
Pictures copyright: eurcopter.
On May 14th,
2005 at 7h08 (local time), a serial Ecureuil/AStar AS 350 B3 piloted by the
EUROCOPTER X-test pilot Didier Delsalle, landed at 8,850 meters (29,035ft) on
the top of the Mount Everest.
This
tremendous achievement breaks the World Record for the highest altitude
landing and take-off ever, which sets an ultimate milestone in the History of
Aviation. Fabrice Brégier, President and CEO of the
EUROCOPTER Group, world leading helicopter manufacturer, immediately
congratulated the pilot and his team for this extraordinary feat.
After taking
off from its base camp Lukla on May 14th, 2005 at 2,866 meters (9,403ft)
Didier Delsalle onboard his Ecureuil AS350B3 reached the top of Mount Everest.
As required by the Fédération Aéronautique Internationale (FAI - International
Aeronautical Federation), the aircraft remained landed on ground more than 2
minutes on the top of the world before flying back to Lukla.
This feat was
renewed the day after.
Stepping
out of his helicopter, Didier Delsalle commented: "To reach this mythical
summit definitively seemed to be a dream; despite the obvious difficulties of
the target to be reached, the aircraft demonstrated its capability to cope
with the situation (…), sublimated by the magic of the place”.
Achieved with
a serial helicopter, this absolute World Record once more contributes to
underline the unique qualities of the Ecureuil/AStar AS350 B3 as a
multipurpose, reliable, quick and comfortable helicopter which emerges as the
most performing aircraft in the world in the most extreme conditions.
During the
trial period, Didier Delsalle and his Ecureuil/AStar AS350 B3 flew some rescue
missions on behalf of the Nepalese authorities demonstrating the operational
capabilities of the aircraft used to set the altitude landing and take-off
World Record.
This feat has
been achieved further to various flight tests begun one year ago with the
Ecureuil/AStar AS350 B3 among which:
-
Experimental flight up to 8,992 meters (29,500 ft) in April 2004 in Istres
(France),
-
“Time to climb” records to the heights of 3,000, 6,000 and 9,000 meters
performed on April 14th, 2005 in respectively 2 minutes 21 seconds, 5 minutes
6 seconds and 9 minutes 26 seconds. These records smash the previous ones held
by an Ecureuil/AStar AS350 B1 with respectively 2 minutes 59 seconds, 6
minutes 55 seconds and 13 minutes 52 seconds,
-
Experimental flight up to 10.211 meters (33.500 ft) on April 14, 2005,
-
Landing at the South Pass of Mount Everest at 7,925 meters (26,000 ft) on May
12th, 2005, establishing a new altitude landing and take-off record,
previously held by a Cheetah helicopter - variant of the Lama - at 7,670
meters (25,150 ft).
With this
landing on the top of the world, EUROCOPTER demonstrates that its
technological innovations provide its products a length - height - ahead, set
at the disposal of its worldwide customers.
To date,
3,670 Ecureuil/AStar have been sold worldwide and logged 15 million flight
hours. Since its introduction on the market, the Ecureuil/AStar/Twinstar
family has been benefiting of successive improvements among which its most
powerful version is the Ecureuil/AStar AS350 B3. This aircraft is serial
equipped with modern systems such as dual channel FADEC, Vehicule and Engine
Monitoring Display, integrated GPS, etc…. 424 Ecureuil/AStar AS350 B3 are
currently in operation worldwide, mainly used for missions requiring high
performances, such as aerial work (cargo sling capacity: 1,400kg) in very high
and hot conditions.
 |
Millet One
Sport Everest Boot has made some minor changes by adding
more Kevlar. USES Expeditions / High
altitude / Mountaineering in extremely cold conditions / Isothermal to
-75°F Gore-Tex® Top dry / Evazote Reinforcements with aramid threads.
Avg. Weight: 5 lbs 13 oz Sizes: 5 - 14 DESCRIPTION Boot with semi-rigid
shell and built-in Gore-Tex® gaiter reinforced by aramid threads, and
removable inner slipper Automatic crampon attachment Non-compressive
fastening Double zip, so easier to put on Microcellular midsole to
increase insulation Removable inner slipper in aluminized alveolate
Fiberglass and carbon footbed Cordura + Evazote upper Elasticated
collar.
Expedition footwear for
mountaineering in conditions of extreme cold. NOTE US
SIZES LISTED. See more here. |
|
|
 |
A cold
weather, high altitude double boot for extreme conditions The Olympus
Mons is the perfect choice for 8000-meter peaks. This super lightweight
double boot has a PE thermal insulating inner boot that is coupled with
a thermo-reflective outer boot with an integrated gaiter. We used a
super insulating lightweight PE outsole to keep the weight down and the
TPU midsole is excellent for crampon compatibility and stability on
steep terrain. WEIGHT: 39.86 oz • 1130 g LAST: Olympus Mons
CONSTRUCTION: Inner: Slip lasted Outer: Board Lasted OUTER BOOT: Cordura®
upper lined with dual-density PE micro-cellular thermal insulating
closed cell foam and thermo-reflective aluminium facing/ Insulated
removable footbed/ Vibram® rubber rand
See more here. |
|
|
|